View Single Post
Old 04-24-2007, 05:23 AM   #40 (permalink)
billybobama
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 694
Points: 3,801, Level: 39
Points: 3,801, Level: 39 Points: 3,801, Level: 39 Points: 3,801, Level: 39
Level up: 1%, 149 Points needed
Level up: 1% Level up: 1% Level up: 1%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
billybobama is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
Demonstrating exactly my point that placing you generally with certain schools of thought such as liberalism or conservatism is a more accurate depiction of your philosophy than your party. You can't classify all Democrats as 'liberal', and you can't classify all Republicans as 'conservative'...you can, however, classify certain individuals as one or the other.



Now I think you're generalizing and using the party hackery. Party hackery, which is used much more in controlling the ignorant and keeping the public debate within a narrow confine. Those people you listed are Republicans, but not all Republicans agree with their philosophies. Some Republicans are more conservative, and some are more neo-conservative (and many used to be almost libertarian conservative; Goldwater, etc.).

This is why such terms as conservative and liberal are used to differentiate individuals more accurately in terms of their ideologies. I consider myself socialist, and yeah I may sway more left on some issues and more right on others; but to give people a general idea of where my line of thought is coming from we have such a term as socialist.
Thank you for proving my point, when asked a direct question that you could not dodge. You had had to stoop to personal attack rather than answer the question. You say you are a Socialist, boom I know exactly where you stand. You never identified 1 person, I repeat not 1, that is either a Liberal or Conservative.