View Single Post
Old 04-26-2007, 10:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
foundit66
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Simple
A same sex couple = 2 men or 2 women
A mixed-sex couple = one man and one woman
Ergo, it's gender discrimination.
If the difference is gender, and one form is allowed based on gender, and the other is prohibited based on gender, it is GENDER DISCRIMINATION.

And as we keep pointing out, but you continue to ignore, it does not matter if two things are different.
A jew is different from a christian.
But the law still treats them the same.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Which coincidentally is what it takes to produce new life in the form of a baby
That would be relevant if procreative capability were a requirement for marriage, but it's not.

This is just another attempt to work "literacy" in the issue when the real emphasis that is desired is "anti-black".


Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
So by your definition, a marriage is for the sake of having a child, not for love?
That's what I love about people who argue about "damaging marriage".
In the end, their rush to turn to requirements which have nothing to do with the fundamentals of marriage demonstrate PRECISELY a desire to "damage" marriage.

Love is irrelevant.
Being able to have a baby is tantamount.
And THAT is the "sacredness" of it all...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher