View Single Post
Old 08-02-2005, 12:26 AM   #34 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,445
Country:
Points: 64,139, Level: 100
Points: 64,139, Level: 100 Points: 64,139, Level: 100 Points: 64,139, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
Tadpole,

You keep referring to parasitic organisms in this debate. So here's a something to ponder. Those people who rely upon welfare are parasitic organisms. They depend upon the work and taxes of others in order to receive money. Do we have the right to kill them??? Think of the money we could save, since 1960 we have spent almost 7 trillion dollars on the War on Poverty. Since these people really have no quality of life to begin with, and seeing how the Courts in the Teri Schiavo case weighed heavily upon her supposed quality of life, it seems like the perfect solution to ending poverty.
Bad bad argument.

An infant is a parasytic organism inside an individual's body. That individual has the right to nurture it or remove it as she sees fit. People on welfare may be parasites on society (your opinion, not mine) but that is an entirely different issue. I am speaking from a clinical medical position, you are speaking from a philosophical one. Your argument just holds no water at all.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey