04-30-2007, 04:13 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Gender:  Posts: 11,896 Country:  Points: 39,908, Level: 100 | Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed |  |  Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxian  Gary, I would like to debate this topic with you. I had posted this on the first page of this thread, and I am still wondering what the answer is: | Originally Posted by Jaxian  We are all aware of the physical characteristics of same-sex and opposite-sex couples. But how is this justification for treating same-sex couples in an inferior fashion to opposite-sex couples?
Inferior? Or just different?
Your question makes a moot point. It's like asking why should we treat same sex couples the same as opposite sex couples when they are not the same?
All these euphemisms skirt around the main issue, which is that most people consider homosexuals to be
defective
dysfunctional
weird
pick your own word.
And they think that way for good reasons.
No matter how much you want to try and dictate how people should think, you can never change this.
Most people agree homosexuals should be able to carry on with their lifestyles regardless of how we think of them
However, sooner or later we reach a point where we have to draw the line.
THe redefinition of marriage to accommodate homosexuals represents that line
|