 Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher  Originally Posted by Jaxian 
[i]We are all aware of the physical characteristics of same-sex and opposite-sex couples. But how is this justification for treating same-sex couples in an inferior fashion to opposite-sex couples?
Inferior? Or just different?
Your question makes a moot point. It's like asking why should we treat same sex couples the same as opposite sex couples when they are not the same? | Are you still harping on that stupid argument?
Oh yeah. You DROPPED the argument last time I got to the same point where you couldn't make any further argument...
Just BEING different IS NOT justification for discrimination.
Remember our discussion on "legitimate state interest"?
I book-marked the post where you acknowledged its existence, in case you were thinking of changing your story.
Or in case you had completely forgotten what it means... Quote: |
Originally Posted by garysher All these euphemisms skirt around the main issue, which is that most people consider homosexuals to be
defective
dysfunctional
weird | Most people consider you an ignorant buffoon.
That doesn't mean we also think you should have equal rights.
And with gays, despite how inaccurate your claim is, most people think that gays should have ALL THE SAME rights and privileges that straights have with only one exception. Gay marriage.
Ergo, your claim is both unproven and irrelevant. "(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher  |