View Single Post
Old 08-02-2005, 02:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,255
Country:
Points: 32,028, Level: 100
Points: 32,028, Level: 100 Points: 32,028, Level: 100 Points: 32,028, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 85%
Activity: 85% Activity: 85% Activity: 85%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by prescott911
it is not the gun companies fault that people go out and shoot people but when they sell guns like semi automatics or even automatics, which aren't used for hunting, shootings of any kind are their fault because of those types of guns.

but it is still the gun owners decision to go out and shoot up the victims. so im kind of confused and in the middle on this one.

i think one of the moderators should continue this discussion in another forum.
I think it is ridiculous they sell guns with such destructive capability such as a semi automatic. But I put none of the blame on the gun company, they cannot be responsible for the idiots that handle their guns... Its a ridiculous argument.

Nations with better gun control than America have less violent crime. Makes sense to me.
How? Violence has been engraved in our culture, the mass believe that they should carry a gun around for protection doing nomore than supporting their right to bare arms. You cannot blame the gun companies for the decisions that their buyers make.
The gun companies are so far up our governments ass that it is hard not to blame them. But I blame our lazy ass populous more for letting them be there in the first place.