View Single Post
Old 08-03-2005, 11:01 PM   #41 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,380
Country:
Points: 54,307, Level: 100
Points: 54,307, Level: 100 Points: 54,307, Level: 100 Points: 54,307, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
That wouldn't work in court and it doesn't work here. If our Constitution truly addressed the rights of a fetus it wouldn't be vague about the matter. You are grasping for something that isn't there.
Really, then explain how the right of privacy can be found in the pneumbras of the Constitution. By your very argument, the so-called right of privacy does not exist, that being the case, the right to choice is also null and void, and this debate would not be occuring. We can find the liberal rights in the pneumbras, but when a conservative uses the same pneumbras we are being vague and grasping at something that isn't there, talk about hypocrisy. This just goes to prove the point, if its not there, its not there and henceforth does not exist.

dmk
Now you are not even trying to make sense. You can't hide facts with fancy words and psuedo logic. What the hell does privacy have to do with abortion?
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Sponsored Links