Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher  Very simple - I oppose adoption by single parents too, streaight or homosexual, because it puts the best interests of the child last. |
Which is better for a child?
Being adopted by NO parent, or being adopted by a qualified parent?
Because your plan in NO WAY takes kids from "single parent" homes to put them in "mother / father" homes.
All it does is reduce the population which can adopt, and thus increases the number of kids who need to be adopted. Kids who actually HAVE a parent in the current status quo would have none under your plan.
So please. Don't eat the "bread" but rather starve waiting for the "cake"...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garysher yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
Most intelligent thing you've said all day...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garysher Actually, if you are telling orphans that they have to be farmed out to homosexuals just to make the statisitcs look better, and to try and justify your IMmorality |
This isn't about "statistics".
These are kids who HAVE good parents under the status quo, but not YOUR PERSONAL "ideal"...
Gays who love these kids and raise them just as any straight parent does. With NO research showing any difference in the child.
And why do you keep trying to back-pedal onto the "morality" issue.
You keep trying to claim that gays are inferior parents, and over and over again now all you talk about is your own personal, arbitrary "morality" issues.
And I say again.
If you don't want a kid to get adopted by a particular parent based SOLELY on your arbitrary "morality" issues, then that is pretty damn selfish of you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garysher The needs of the children MUST come first, not your gay politicking |
And again, you would INCREASE the number of orphans who know NO parents by setting up a standard of SOLELY having "mother / father" parents adopting.
The child sees NO DETRIMENT being adopted by gay parents. NONE whatsoever.
Gay parents meet the child's needs JUST AS WELL as straight parents do.
So how can you claim it's a "need" when gays do the job just as well?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by garysher Trying to dismiss centuries of precedence, Mother Nature and the majority of Americans is furhter proof of your demented desire to avoid truth and reality so you can live in a selfish cocoon of delusion with your homosexual activists cohorts |
Again, having only ONE scenario allowed, straight parenting, is not "precedence".
We overlooked "centuries" of precedent when we allowed women to vote. When we allowed blacks to vote.
The TRUE precedent here is the CONSTITUTION.
And don't speak to me of your personal mumbo-jumbo on "Mother Nature". Just because you try to pretend "nature" has an intelligence doesn't mean that we have to throw human research out the window.
And for the record, "majority of Americans" SUPPORT gay adoption.
The ONLY state that prohibits gay adoption is Florida.
There are a few other states that have tried to prohibit gay adoption, and the legislation attempts were SHOT DOWN.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
