Oh no, I have the historical knowledge, I am a history buff. And I can see what you are getting at, but it is not a logical or rational conclusion, by any means. You are trying to say that people must feel the same, and consistant on all things in all situations, but that is simply not the case, you can change very minor variables and have a huge effect on how people feel about a given subject. For example. If I were to say I was going to ban pornography, a lot of people would be all for it. But those same people would cry in their coffee and have a tantrum if I said I was going to ban christianity (the real perversion of morals). You like to throw a lot of fancy terms and archaic words around in your arguments to try to hide the fact that your arguments are weak and nearly basless. And that probably works with most people you encounter, the problem is that the regulars on this site are highly intelligent, you are going to have to bring more than smoke & mirrors to pull that shit off with us.