05-14-2007, 02:54 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Gender:  Posts: 11,893 Country:  Points: 39,710, Level: 100 | Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos Really? Where do you get that idea?
>>>>>>>>>>> I get that idea from U.S. military policy which implements Pub.L. 103-160 (10 U.S.C. § 654b) passed by the US Congress in 1993.
Please try to follow your country's news
"It wasn’t an issue at work."
No comment is even necessary. | Comment is very necessary. His buddy was trying to defend an indefensible position, perhaps he has homosexual tendencies too?
And he is only one person. Who's to say there was no detrimental effect on other naval personnel?
The fact is the US Military, supported by the American People via Congress, has chosen not to have open homosexuals poodling around in the military of the world's sole superpower |