View Single Post
Old 05-18-2007, 10:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
hkbajwa
Council Member
 
hkbajwa's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pakistan
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,179
Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Level up: 49%, 103 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hkbajwa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis View Post
I didn't mention it in the paper, but ID doesn't even come into conflict with evolution. Evolution addresses how life developed and ID addresses how existence originated. They're answers to two very different questions.
I agree completely. The ID "movement" seems to be more centered on discrediting evolution than it it on increasing the knowledge of students.

Evolution describes HOW.. and ID explains WHY.

ID can, in the view of present knowledge, only possibly explain WHY.. but if i want to know HOW life originated i prefer to look to science and reason.. And i don't understand why those who believe in ID shouldn't do the same. Evolution does not deny ID. It just denies biblical explanations to the creation of life.
Love for all, Hatred for none