View Single Post
Old 05-20-2007, 02:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Antithesis
Council Member
 
Antithesis's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The great, dead heart of suburbia
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,541
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 6,440, Level: 52
Points: 6,440, Level: 52 Points: 6,440, Level: 52 Points: 6,440, Level: 52
Level up: 53%, 110 Points needed
Level up: 53% Level up: 53% Level up: 53%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olifant View Post
Yes but it was not to "RULE" over the blacks. You are equating Apartheid to slavery in the US where blacks were disenfranchised but had to work for the US economy. Blacks here were free to go elsewhere and work and live. They simply did not have access as citizens to the infrastructures of the white government without proper doccumentation etc.
WHY WOULD THEY EVEN NEED DOCUMENTATION?! That doesn't make any sense, requiring a permit to visit a specific part of their own country! And blacks in South Africa were disenfranchised as well. The Separate Representation of Voters Act was meant to remove blacks from federal elections. Now they had their own council, but that council had to answer to the white South African government, so really there was almost no control.
__________________
"Every time I hear the phrase 'Christian nation' I run to my car and blast a Slayer album at full volume." - Me
Antithesis is offline   Reply With Quote