View Single Post
Old 06-05-2007, 01:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
pensacola_niceman
A Funny Fellow
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,730
Country:
Points: 18,652, Level: 86
Points: 18,652, Level: 86 Points: 18,652, Level: 86 Points: 18,652, Level: 86
Level up: 61%, 198 Points needed
Level up: 61% Level up: 61% Level up: 61%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
pensacola_niceman is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Quite frankly, I can't help but wonder if you could work in something similar under existing U.S. laws.
If the "denial" incorporates slander or liberal, it could easily be seen as legally actionable.
And let's face it. Some of the "stories" you hear about denial often talk about how the "Jew" created this lie.

Obviously there are some grey areas. If no mention of who was supposedly responsible for the claimed "fraud", there is no target for the slander/libel.
Also, I suspect it is easier to perpetuate such libel / slander if you avoid naming names but instead blame the general group, although I can't help but think such a cop-out should not be allowed.
It's hardly any less slanderous (IMO) if you are "vague" about it...
What you "think" can not ever be considered slander - no matter how vile and twisted it might be.