View Single Post
Old 07-01-2007, 04:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
akuma
Council Member
 
akuma's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,474
Country:
Points: 4,188, Level: 41
Points: 4,188, Level: 41 Points: 4,188, Level: 41 Points: 4,188, Level: 41
Level up: 19%, 162 Points needed
Level up: 19% Level up: 19% Level up: 19%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to akuma
akuma is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski View Post
However, the original post has a valid point. If a woman decides to have a child, the man is legally and fiscally responsible for taking care of the child. We have dead beat dad laws, that allow the government to withhold from a man's check funds to pay child support. If it truly is a woman's body and her right to choose, then if she chooses to have the baby then should she not accept the responsiblity?

Furthermore, if the man is responsible if a woman has a baby, then should he not have a say in whether or not she decides to have the baby.

Come now. If it truly were a woman's body and her right to choose, well then there would be no need for dead beat dad laws now would there. Just another in the long list of hypocrisy when it comes to woman and abortion.

dmk
First, I am a gay man and do not think I will ever have to personally have to deal with the issue of abortion. However, I do not think that the father should have the right to force the mother to carry the baby to full term.

If she does have the baby, he should pay support as the mother is the one that had to go through labor and most likely will raise the child alone.
One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small,
And the ones that mother gives you don't do anything at all.