Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis I think MSNBC did a debate between Al Sharpton and Christopher Hitchens. Both are widely criticized for intolerance and both are opposites in terms of their views. It was quite obviously sensationalism. If people wanted real information, they'd get more reliable correspondents instead of the ones who would be the most controversial. | Thank you, Antithesis. That was the word I was looking for: sensationalism. First of all, putting that idiot Al Sharpton on in any forum was just to guarantee controversy. I'm surprised that they didn't have Geraldo Rivera and a couple of Neo-Nazis on to really start something.
I'm sorry, but Al Sharpton really brings out my anger. Thinking that this idiot represents the black community is foolish. He represents his own self interests, nothing more. Just like he really was looking out for Tawana Brawley years ago. |