View Single Post
Old 07-14-2007, 05:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Katczinsky
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,687
Country:
Points: 14,509, Level: 78
Points: 14,509, Level: 78 Points: 14,509, Level: 78 Points: 14,509, Level: 78
Level up: 15%, 341 Points needed
Level up: 15% Level up: 15% Level up: 15%
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
Existence vs. Non-existence
I was in a debate earlier about the paradox of God supposedly being able to 'exist' while at the same time being objectified from existence (in order to create it). And it got me thinking.

The way I understand physics, is that the universe is expanding and with it space/time. I was wondering how exactly space/time expands into nothingness, or the absence of space-time. Because nothingness isn't some 'space' to move around in, as it is negated by the fact that it is nothingness...or no space at all. So adding onto the debate on 'how can God be objectified from existence', how can the universe expand existence into non-existence? And for that matter, how can two (or more) different existences exist as their own separate totalities (parallel worlds, separate universes, etc.) when there is "nothing" to separate them? Two objects can't be seen parallel to one another in a void of 'nothingness' (because nothingness isn't a void but rather no space or time existing).

I was just wondering if any of you thinkers out there had any thoughts on this.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72

Last edited by Katczinsky; 07-14-2007 at 05:42 PM.
Sponsored Links