So, even though these supposed technologies and weapons are...ummm...top secret, you are fully confident that such supposed weapons actually exist and are capable of pulling off the supposed feat of "dustifying" the Twin Towers?

(It must be quite convenient for you that these supposed technologies and weapons are top secret, aye CB_Brooklyn...since, because of this secrecy, you can claim that the US can do anything at all it that it may want to do in this physical world no matter how rediculous it sounds. )

Well, if you ask me, why couldn't Dr. Wood just as well claim that there is a possibility that God "dustified" the Twin Towers?

Or, why couldn't Dr. Wood just as well claim that there is the possibility that some previously unknown and unwitnessed natural process "dustified" the Twin Towers?

Why, in short, should she limit the cause of the supposed "dustification" of the Twin Towers to some US weapon technology since she is unaware as to how this supposed "dustification" had occured?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CB_Brooklyn The power required to evaporate the steel in one of the WTC towers is

Well, evidently Dr Wood simply made up the term "dustification" without even proposing a known method by which steel can be...well..."dustified."

And Dr. Jenkins is going by what objective facts the scientific community has established concerning materials such as steel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CB_Brooklyn The technology to "dustify" metal via energy waves exists.

So then, in which peer-reviewed scientific journal can I find a single paper in which an actual experiment has been carried out whereby steel (or any solid metal) has been "dustified" via energy waves?

Thanks, in advance.

(And no, a video isn't a peer-reviewed scientific journal.)