View Single Post
Old 07-27-2007, 11:42 AM   #14 (permalink)
highway80west
Moderator
Moderator
 
highway80west's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,613
Country:
Points: 22,789, Level: 93
Points: 22,789, Level: 93 Points: 22,789, Level: 93 Points: 22,789, Level: 93
Level up: 44%, 561 Points needed
Level up: 44% Level up: 44% Level up: 44%
Activity: 91%
Activity: 91% Activity: 91% Activity: 91%
highway80west is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
While I would be the first to say that Mike Vick is an outstanding and gifted athlete;this really doesn't have anything to do with the charges proffered against him. I am glad of the new "no tolerance" policy of the NFL in regards to the offield behavior of its players. I really believe that the NFL commissioner will punish him more severely than any court could. Take Vick away from the football field, and what do you have- nothing!
That echoes to what the late-Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis did to members of the 1919 Chicago White Sox. We all know that Shoeless Joe Jackson were among the players banned for life.

Even though a court of law acquitted them, Landis put the hammer down. And the men became nothing. Even Shoeless Joe ran a bar. The man could play, and he should be in the hall of fame, too.

[/quote] I do believe in letting him and any one else charged with a crime have their day and their say in court. I believed he will be fined at most. I really think some better judgement could have been shown by Vick.[/quote]

Yes, he should have been more aware, if he claimed he didn't know what was happening, of what was happening. Oh well.
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105

Last edited by highway80west; 07-27-2007 at 01:56 PM.