View Single Post
Old 08-03-2007, 05:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,854
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by highway80west View Post
You know, if President Bush felt that Pakistan was not a willing participant in fighting terrorism there, he may have gone into Pakistan. But because Pakistan was (for lack of a better word) willing to help fight terrorism, the president has not gone into Pakistan.

Now since the US invaded Iraq, I feel that they should have concentrated their fight against terrorism in Afhganistan instead, and press on with finding Bin Laden.

I saw that Obama is off his trolley when he is thinking about invading Pakistan. After all, we know Pakistant convicted the terrorist of killing Daniel Pearl.
Speaking from experience I can tell you that Pakistan is no ally of the U.S., they do more to support terrorism than Iraq ever did, and they are a far greater threat than Iran. Pakistan was directly involved in 9/11 and they provide aid and support to our enemies over there.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey