Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman Not to piss on your parade boss, but the military is specifically listed in the Constitution as a requirement of the federal government. This means that out of ALL of our wonderful entitlement programs, the federal is constitutionally obligated to "provide for the common defense" first. | Yes, the common defense. Standing armies, however, I believe is an entirely different story. Not only is such a military industrial complex not conferred in the constitution but many will say that it's against the spirit of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence in the first place. Having a huge military apparatus that occupies military bases in most of the world's recognized nations was never apart of the inclinations of the authors of the Constitution. I believe Hev was merely talking about returning to our more humble military existence we enjoyed before, at least so that we're not on the level as to where we're exporting our hegemony (*cough* I mean freedom *cough*) as an imperialist power.
Perhaps if the tax went to more social and humanitarian causes, such as feeding the poor, aiding the sick, or bettering our education system; the tax system wouldn't look as if to be a necessary evil. "If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Last edited by Katczinsky; 08-05-2007 at 08:41 PM.
|