Re: Deaf Activism? Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa I'm sure there is a very strong deaf culture that they take great pride in. And why not?? It is a language all its own.
If two deaf parents have a child who is naturally deaf I see no problem in letting them raise that child deaf as they see fit. When the child becomes an adult they can choose if they want the operation or not. | Come on. Deafness is a disability. ASL is an extremely limiting language in itself and being deaf puts one at a huge disadvantage in life in general. The culture isn't even a culture. It's just like my example of a wheelchair-people club or a quadriplegic culture. It puts people in a definite disadvantage, and the parents are outright denying the child a full life. What if the child decides to get the operation when they're 18 or 19? They'll have the vocabularly not even of a 3 year-old. That leaves the child at a distinct disadvantage as the child would obviously prefer to "speak" with ASL. There are too many barriers to overcome that late in life. Seriously, what culture does being deaf entail? ASL isn't unique to deaf people, since "hearies" can sign as well. So the child would still learn sign language, in addition to being able to live a decent life. There's no reason to deny the child a cure for a handicap like that. If the opposite of pro is con, what is Congress? |