I'm so grateful to you for mentioning this myt.
It provides me an ideal opportunity to reinforce my point.
#1:
"Words mean things." Rush Limbaugh

Your above quoted comment suggests my post is in some way (any way) subjective.
Hardly!

Just consider the objective facts.
Religion, and superstition are essentially the same.
Technically, the former is a subset of the latter; but why split that hair?
It is technically correct; it is factually objective (NOT subjective) to recognize supernatural religion as "superstition".
"Insane" (extracted from the definition) is the correct term to apply to those that make absolutely extraordinary claims; with absolutely no proof whatsoever.
If it is within your power to do so sir or ma'am, I sincerely hope you will do so as skillfully as possible.
That's what I thought.
a) How has "secular humanism" crept in here? I have not made claim to "secular humanism" in this thread. In fact, I believe I was quite explicit in stating that I made no claim at all; other than that the assertions of the supernaturalists, ie the superstitious, are unproved. Further, the burden of proof is on them to prove; NOT me to disprove.

b) Regarding "no basis in objective morality"; piffle.
First of all, what's "objective" about the morality the Bible and its ostensible followers tout?
Second, before you make this "no basis" assertion of yours, you should first study Freud, Jung, Skinner, and fundamental principles & history of British Common Law. Studying the works of the ethicists might also help guide you on this. But for you to assume there is no basis, simply because you don't understand the basis there is, is a demonstration of your ignorance; not an objective, factual observation.
Piffle.
a) "She, and a man" [YOUR assertion] made a choice to have sex. If you consider the details of such agreements, seldom do they include specific details on child support. And without documentation, even if there were some child support agreement, it would not be likely to be legally binding.
b) It is a fundamental premise of Christianity that a woman can become pregnant without having sex.
Spare me your "mountains and oceans" myt.
Just one! Please just cite ONE "shred" of "proof" of any manifest supernatural anything.
Take it up with them.
I have made no atheist claim here.
I'm on explicit, unambiguous record as being agnostic here.
How could I possibly have made it any clearer?
Have I suggested otherwise?
Splendid.
That's your opinion. And the 1st Amendment promises your right to exercise that opinion.
It does so as follows:
However:
The same 1st Amendment also promises my right to exclude your exercise from imposing upon me.
It does so as follows:
* Excerpted from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.