 Ooo-kay? Where is this liberal bend again? Oh, I get it, if there is any remark made against Reagan or his pals, even if it only perceived to be a negative remark, it must be liberal ignorance am I right?
You took one small piece of the article and used it to attack CNN for having a purported liberal bias.
How about I do the same ok? Quote: |
Deaver protected the commander in chief's image and enhanced it with a flair for choosing just the right settings, poses and camera angles.
| Quote: |
Deaver's greatest skill "was in arranging what were known as good visuals -- televised events or scenes that would leave a powerful symbolic image in people's minds," former first lady Nancy Reagan recalled in her memoir, "My Turn."
| Quote: |
One example was Reagan's visit to the beaches of Normandy, in France, to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Allied invasion of Europe during World War II. Deaver arranged for Reagan to appear on a cliff overlooking the English Channel and address D-Day veterans, which yielded dramatic video and still images of the president.
| Oh, look positive remarks about the guy! Should I spin this bit of writing and claim that CNN is Pro-Reaganite? Or should I do the right thing and look at the article as a whole? |