Originally Posted by tristanrobin

As has also been done with your posts, I have to make some kind of choice. Did you not understand the article? Or are you attempting to be dishonestly misrepresent it?

Oh God no, that's never been done to my links. Ever. Noooo....Uh uh. Puleeze.

There is no "they." This is not a news article. This is an EDITORIAL. This is a (very well done) piece by ONE MAN.

But when I post links "by one man", the guy gets railed. Remember my Germ Theory link that was beat up on because it was theorized by a "physicist". Until I pointed out that he partnered with a evolutionary biologist. Whether it's "well done" I guess may depend on perspective.
Speaking of which, Wiki has a bit more on it.
Pathogenic hypothesis of homosexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You seem to think that an editorial op/ed piece is the same thing as a news story. Either that - or you do know and simply dishonestly represent it in your posts in order to further fan the flames of bigotry.

I really didn't even look a the by-line. So I just read it as a news report. As far as fanning the flames of bigotry, why do we need more than one thread about this. There have to have been about 4 of them now. I seems like there's an attempt to light a fire for homonormativity.

(And, for what it's worth, I think the majority of people cruisiing mens restrooms ARE closeted hypocrites looking for love on the sly. Your average gay man does not have to resort to such unsavory - and illegal - practices to find sexual partners. The reason a person would engage in such behaviour is that he's afraid to be "found out" as gay...which would happen in a gay bar or at a gay social event. Are any of these men just gay? Of course. Where ever there are large numbers of men, there will be gay men among them.)