View Single Post
Old 08-25-2005, 03:25 PM   #94 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,446
Country:
Points: 64,327, Level: 100
Points: 64,327, Level: 100 Points: 64,327, Level: 100 Points: 64,327, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now
Reply With Quote
Re: Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabris
Yes. I see those as nothing but a pure waste. As I said, I could easily go down the road of just disregarding the thing until point X, but yeah. It's tempting...and for the most part I already adopted that view. But there needs to be some reason to curb the number of abortions in the first place, meaning one's performed as birth control. It's cheaper to take a morning-after pill or go on a BC pill anyway, than shell out $500 and increase the risk of not being able to have a child later on each time one is performed. Know what I'm saying? The practicality of having less abortions is more my concern than necessarily "protecting fetuses" because they wouldn't be there in the first place if people were responsible and didn't need to get an abortion. I'll be able to better explain it tomorrow, I think...I'm exhausted and just ate 3lbs of grilled steak....so good...ugh.
Zygotes are not Children! Period. There are no Children anywhere in this argument that need protecting, except the unfortunate ones who get pregnant and need to be protected from some right wing nut job while on her way to an abortion clinic.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey