Thread: Trial averted over human life beginning
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2007, 10:01 AM   #137 (permalink)
Catus Felidae
Council Member
 
Catus Felidae's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Country:
Points: 11,274, Level: 70
Points: 11,274, Level: 70 Points: 11,274, Level: 70 Points: 11,274, Level: 70
Level up: 6%, 376 Points needed
Level up: 6% Level up: 6% Level up: 6%
Activity: 35%
Activity: 35% Activity: 35% Activity: 35%
Catus Felidae is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
And why would you ask a question based on another question based on something I never said?

Right here.

Until she becomes pregnant. No one forced her to have sex. And if she was forced, then there should be abortioni recourse. But once the "choice" to have sex with any one you want results in the beginning of a life, the decision to end that life should be supported by something more substantial than "choice".



And I thought a "debate" required an exchange of ideas, not irrational questions created from the thin air.
How is that an 'irrational' question. YOU made the statement that if a woman didn't agree to the sex, she doesn't have to agree to the pregnancy. YOU have drawn a line here regarding when and why an abortion should be legal.

I just want to know what qualifies YOU to make that decision for a woman you don't even know.

If you're going to demand that right, don't you think that you should at least have to explain why YOU are more qualified to do so than the pregnant woman? Or are all pregnant women just supposed to bow to your perfection?
Bother not the cat. For they are sneaky and will piss on thy keyboard.