View Single Post
Old 09-17-2007, 05:12 PM   #27 (permalink)
nuttyjoe
Council Member
 
nuttyjoe's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,403
Points: 7,384, Level: 57
Points: 7,384, Level: 57 Points: 7,384, Level: 57 Points: 7,384, Level: 57
Level up: 17%, 166 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 16%
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hio View Post
I loved how John Madden said that this "spygate" issue is almost debunked because the first game that the Pats play after the camera's were taken...they beat the snot out of the Chargers proving that the Pats dont need anything. They are pure skill.
You are correct, sir: but that still doesn't erase the fact that a rule was broken by the Pats; and must be punished.If a player can be suspended for a huge chunk of the season, and maybe even banned; does this not extend to a coach as well? And should this extend to Belichick? Throw Mike Vick back into the mix. If he were to just receive a huge fine for his behavior and maybe a short stint (or not) in jail, can the NFL just "move on" as Belichick wants everyone to do in his case? Now add the fact that Vick has broken no rules of football. Belichick has. But who is the one that everyone seems to want banned from the sport? Mike Vick. Why the double-standard, people?