 Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe  You are correct, sir: but that still doesn't erase the fact that a rule was broken by the Pats; and must be punished.If a player can be suspended for a huge chunk of the season, and maybe even banned; does this not extend to a coach as well? And should this extend to Belichick? Throw Mike Vick back into the mix. If he were to just receive a huge fine for his behavior and maybe a short stint (or not) in jail, can the NFL just "move on" as Belichick wants everyone to do in his case? Now add the fact that Vick has broken no rules of football. Belichick has. But who is the one that everyone seems to want banned from the sport? Mike Vick. Why the double-standard, people? | The only reason that Michael Vick was "suspended" was that they cant ban him from the sport of Football because of his actions because he did nothing against the NFL. What he did was outside the bounds of NFL and they only "suspended" him so that he would still earn his salary Because he obviously isnt active nor inactive/injury.
What Belichick did also had no personal gain to it IE money, like Pete Rose did. What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26} |