Quote:
Originally Posted by Hio They took away the camera after the 1st quarter and Goodall told the media that the camera had no effect on the outcome of the game whatsoever.
As for Belechick's job security, that was secured after the Patriots first Super Bowl victory...A game that was tight all the way down to the end seconds and relied on a FG...If we honestly had the Ram's def scouted with camera's the game would of been blown open far more then a FG. Which that season we were basicly the underdogs (10-6 I think) throughout the season....no one expected us to reach it let alone win it.
And a team is only as good as the coach that leads them...team cant run without plays plays cant be made without a coach.
And what about the years we didnt make it to the super bowl? Did the camera feed fail? Was our camera man sick on important games? Proves that the Patriots are not invincible and even if we did have cameras had no effect on the games or we would of had 6 straight Super Bowl trophies and banners hanging in the stadium. | Sir, you are still avoiding the one important point , so I will ask you directly: Was or was not a rule of the sport which could have given a team an unfair advantage broken or not? This, and this only, is the only thing that must be adressed; not what we may think of our favorite (or other)teams. |