View Single Post
Old 09-19-2007, 08:43 PM   #93 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,260
Country:
Points: 32,052, Level: 100
Points: 32,052, Level: 100 Points: 32,052, Level: 100 Points: 32,052, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 84%
Activity: 84% Activity: 84% Activity: 84%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonefishin View Post
But being in underwear is not being nude. You are covered by cloth. it doesn't matter if that cloth comes out of a package labeled shorts or underpants. it's cloth and it covers the genitalia. so technically you can't really be considered nude in them.can you honestly always tell the difference between a woman in a bikini and a woman in a bra/underwear? not unless you touch the fabric in some cases, and yet one is allowed in public and the other is not.

If that is the legal letter of the law then I highly disagree with this ban.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.