09-25-2007, 03:33 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
| Congressional Representative Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Alabama Gender:  Posts: 2,730 Points: 15,754, Level: 80 | Level up: 81%, 96 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Observer Furthermore, her plan includes euthanasia that the patient receiving it has no input. In other words, if her "system" finds that treating you is too costly, and you don't have many years left, or aren't an asset to society (moneywise), you may find yourself being put down like an rabid dog. |
I had to take the time to read the plan before responding to this ridiculous claim. It is only 16 pages long so it didn't take long.
Just as I suspected, your above statement is a bald-faced lie. No mention of euthanasia whatsoever.
As to others deciding if you get health care or not, except for the wealthy that is already the case.
What will be different under Clinton's system? Government bureaucrats get to decide instead of insurance industry toadies? Those who are already happy with their insurance companies will not be forced to change so why should they care?
I, for one, think that government bureaucrats might just be an improvement. America spends $700 billion every year on foreign oil. Want to help to stop this? Check out the Pickens Plan website at www.pickensplan.com. If you like what you see, please join me as a Pickens Plan supporter.
It's nothing personal. It's just that we're better than you." -- King Julien  |