Originally Posted by Ollie Gerclamwell

Sorry, incorrect! The provisions of the document can not be used to violate it!

>>>>>>>>>>>

Which part are you talking about being violated?

How do all those dead Americans and their families go about pursuing happiness, exercising free speech, voting, etc??



And how many slaves were there in the British Isles? Now, in the various and assorted colonies of Britain (esp in Africa and West Indies) I guess this was a big deal but the real slavery of all (via colonization) proceeded unabated. You are a fool for arguing such a position. All those dark-skinned peoples maltreated without the "encumbrance of a Constitution". . . I'm really impressed, all those wonderful things Britain permitted itself to do without a pesky Constitution . . .

Thanks for the chuckle!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Chuckle if you wish.

The fact remains that Britain, and most of Europe, abolished slavery long before the US, AND never instituted the kind of apartheid legal system that you somehow managed to justify under the banner of your precious Constitution.







Yes, America will always be in the lead.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the lead in a competition nobody else wants to win - the murder rate





You must not appreciate that a large proportion of the murder problem exists in a small segment of our population and specific geographic locations. For great expanses of America the murder rate is on par with Britain's. As I said in the other thread, Blacks comprise 13% of the gen-pop but they account for over 50% of the murder victims. What does that say to you? Can the factors that are driving over half of America's murders be applied to the whole nation or is it specific to certain geographic locations and the sociological / cultural issues found there?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And here we get the inevitable racial strawman

"It's mostly those damn blacks who shoot each other"!

Are they Americans too? Do you choose to include black Americans when it comes to picking American teams for the Olympics??






Simple "yes or no" questions: are the actions of the Yardies representative of the British as a whole? Should all subjects be treated as if they are Yardies?