Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxian Okay, so if I understand this article correctly, here's what happened:
A anti-gay group was going to give a speech opposing gay rights (they are using their free speech)
A pro-gay group decided to protest the speech (again using their free speech)
The anti-gay group decided to cancel their speech because they thought the protest would generate negative publicitiy (again using their free speech)
Frankly, I don't see what the problem is. Obviously no one's free speech was denied. So are people upset that a speech was being protested? Are you saying, "People shouldn't protest things because those things might be cancelled?" Does that viewpoint make any sense at all? | I agree. I know I wouldn't have canceled my speech.
More on the guy. David Parker - Arrest & Lawsuit Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Buddha |