 Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear  <--------*----------*-------------------*--------------*-----------*>
The above is meant to show what is the sliding scale of measuring sexual orientation. While most folk are at one end or the other, the truly honest folk are not afraid of the fact that this scale is for some fluid and for others, demonstrating their orientation is at the other end.
Too bad there is no support to the sliding scale other than theory. I would agree with that if that sliding scale, which to me, also includes a lot of f'd up "orientations" had some "reason" or "purpose" to support it. I think the incidences of hermaphroditism and gender reversal show that the human is simply prone to disorders related to sexuality.
What is normal is anything on that scale. What is abnormal is living in fear of others who are not in the same place on that bar as one's self.
See above.
Fx, it is my experience that most folk who have phobic conclusions about the sexuality of others are afraid to really admit where they would be plotted if not dictated to by the expectations of society. |
Well you have the right to that conclusion. But I beg to differ. I'm sure it would be safe to assume that you agree with me that having sex with animals is absolutely nasty. Does the fact that we think it's nasty to have sex with animals mean we "are afraid to admit where we would be plotted if not dictated to by the expectations of society" or do we just think it's abnormal for humans to have sex outside their species?
I think your assumption is flawed. 
Last edited by fxashun; 09-29-2007 at 11:08 AM.
|