Defending the Truth - View Single Post - I can understand G and L but why B and T?

garysher · 10-05-2007, 12:59 PM

I can understand why gays and lesbians (G and L) would want to combine forces to lobby for special rights.

Leaving aside the slight redundancy created because lesbians are also gay, just female gays.

But why would they want to combine with bisexuals? Do they claim that bisexuality is also genetic? Or are bisexuals merely confused or chronically indecisive?

What additional rights are bisexuals actually fighting for? Their heterosexual side already has everything that's available. And their homosexual side is already covered under the G's and L's.

Even more unfathomable is the strategy of linking arms with the "transgendered" - men trapped in women's bodies and vice versa.

Are we to believe that being "transgendered" is a genetic tendency too? Or is it mostly weird guys who get a sexual thrill from dressing in women's clothing, and butch girls who want to attract lipstick lesbians?

And are they so utterly confused that they want to permanently maim their bodies to try and kid themselves (but not others) that they aren't what their bodies say they are?

Aren't the "transgendered" homosexuals too - just a subset of the gays and lesbians?

Surely the G's and L's would have a much stronger case if they left the B's and T's to fight their own wayward battles, instead of being hoisted by their own petards?