View Single Post
Old 09-10-2005, 10:56 PM   #32 (permalink)
bullwinkle
Citizen
 
bullwinkle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Level up: 10%, 136 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to bullwinkle
bullwinkle is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
But her candidacy will open the door to all those old issues of the 90's, Whitewater, Travelgate, and what she knew and when she knew it. Although I believe that she would be popular with women voters, I also think she could be a liability. If it can be shown that she knew about Bill's infidelities and stayed with him only for her own political gain, I believe that this fact could turn many women against her.

The lies, the corruption and the cronyism of the Clinton era will all become open targets again. As popular as Hilliary may be within the democratic party, she also has those who despise her both within the party and without. A good Republican candidate who can muster the support of the party faithful, and pick up the Hilliary detractors could ride the wave to the White House.

dmk

After unjust elections and the unjust war I think the issues you mentioned above are small potatoes in the mind of voters, both republican and democrat.
Why The Left Has Lost Credibility

There is much talk of post-election reorganization and rethinking among demoralized liberals, especially in matters of foreign policy. They could start by accepting that the demise of many of their cherished beliefs and institutions was not the fault of others. More often, the problems are fundamental flaws in their own thinking — such as the ends of good intentions justifying the means of expediency and untruth, and forced equality being a higher moral good than individual liberty and freedom. Whether we call such notions “political correctness” or “progressivism,” the practice of privileging race, class, and gender over basic ethical considerations has earned the moralists of the Left not merely hypocrisy, but virtual incoherence. Democratic leaders are never going to be trusted in matters of foreign policy unless they can convince Americans that they once more believe in American exceptionalism and are the proper co-custodians of values such as freedom and individual liberty. If in the 1950s rightists were criticized as cynical Cold Warriors who never met a right-wing thug they wouldn’t support, as long as he mouthed a few anti-Soviet platitudes, then in the last two decades almost any thug from Latin America to the Middle East who professed concern for “the people” — from Castro and the Noriega Brothers to Yasser Arafat and the Iranian mullahs — was likely to earn a pass from the American and European cultural elite and media. To regain credibility, the Left must start to apply the same standard of moral outrage to a number of its favorite causes that it does to the United States government, the corporations, and the Christian Right. Here are a few places to start.