I agree that there are people that are "socially gay". Like the study that I linked a while ago that shows that girls raised by lesbians are more likely to be sexually adventurous. Hell, even among heterosexuals, you can be influenced by porn to think that heterosexual anal sex is "fun". Well I like watching it but in practice it simply takes too much preparation and care to avoid hurting your partner. And that's simply no fun compared to vaginal intercourse as far as I'm concerned.

I think some people are not only hetero, but strictly hetero. They aren't able to "switch sides". I also think some people are a lot more indiscriminate about where they get their sexual pleasure. That's where the paraphilia, which includes homosexuality IMHO, come in to play. I don't like stockings, smoking, latex suits, furries, or wearing womens underwear. But I have a "thing" for balloons. We can either consider humans are meant to be hetero with anything "other" being abnormal. Or we have to consider that "anything goes" as it relates to human sexuality. I don't see how the APA expects humans to NOT consider homosexuality to be a bit "off".

But going back to what you were saying, I am pro-life all the way...I thought. But after seeing that picture on that other thread of that child with that horrible disfigurement, it made me think. If I had a positive for that disorder would I abort my child, I would have to think long and hard about whether I could handle that kind of responsibility. And I keep coming to the conclusion that I would probably have to join the 90% that abort. And that hurts me, but not as much as seeing the difficulty in life that I could have saved my child.