View Single Post
Old 11-14-2007, 01:05 PM   #66 (permalink)
pensacola_niceman
A Funny Fellow
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,584
Country:
Points: 22,169, Level: 92
Points: 22,169, Level: 92 Points: 22,169, Level: 92 Points: 22,169, Level: 92
Level up: 82%, 181 Points needed
Level up: 82% Level up: 82% Level up: 82%
Activity: 82%
Activity: 82% Activity: 82% Activity: 82%
pensacola_niceman is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Exactly.

And even if someone IS homosexual, and declares so on their application, how can they prove that they were dismissed for that reason, instead of a business or performance issue?

If employers ask candidates to disclose their homosexuality on an application form, and they still proceed to hire them, how can that person later claim they were fired because they were homosexual??

Clearly they would never have been hired in the first place ifthe employer was "bigoted" against homosexuals.

This is another one of those goofy PC bills that would become a feeding fest for law school grads and yet another red flag for employers.

It makes more sense NOT to hire homosexuals at all and so avoid the risk of malicious or frivolous litigation.
There is that possibility that a poor performer could sue on the grounds that he was fired because he is gay. As frivolous as his case may be, it will still cost the company a fuckload of money in lawyers fees.