Originally Posted by sgtdmski

I will be the first to admit that some of the claims are outlandish, but, all we have to do is look at some of the conspiracy theories right here in this forum regarding the "Bush regime". Both sides have their crazies......

Thank you!!!! Someone gets it! There are nutcases on both extremes! Can you tell I've been hanging around the Politics section of Yahoo Answers for a little long lol?

But you cannot ignore the factual claims that have been made regarding the Clinton time in the White House, including the health care debascle, the IRS audits, the FBI files, Whitewater, and how many more????

Well one can easily ignore Filegate, as there was nothing but accusations and allegations thrown around. No one got charged, arrested or convicted for anything in that "controversy". Earlier you mentioned FBI records being found in Hillary Clinton's office, could you show me some news story confirming that? Because according to this, the Whitewater Independent Council found no evidence of her or Bill engaging in any misconduct relating to the matter.

Independent Counsel: No 'substantial and credible' evidence of Clinton involvement in 'Filegate' - March 16, 2000

The Whitewater controversy to say the least, was far more murky and shady and nowhere near as clear-cut as Filegate IMO, at least from what I've read. Bill Clinton pardoning some of those who were convicted and sentenced wasn't a smart move to me.

I really don't know anything about the IRS audits you speak of, maybe you could give me a refresher course?

Just to let you know though, if Bill Clinton was ever found guilty of raping any of the women who claimed that he did, I'd lose all respect for him on the spot.

Bush was attacked for being a son of a President, nepotism and all that.
He's attacked for a lot more than that, again like Bill Clinton some of it fair and some not.

So is it not only fair that the same attacks be made upon a former President's wife in her run???

dmk