Originally Posted by hkbajwa

Well you are also assuming that a heterosexual union is follows certain "standards". It doesn;t. Every union is in itself unique, regardless of whether it's a homo-or heterosexual union.

There is a "standard". The standard is opposite gender. And with the exception of yet another "abnormal" group, that system is distinct and binary. While each person may have distinct qualities that makes them unique, there is also a standard for the human species. 2 arms 2 legs one head etc. Deviance from that is called a disorder.

TO say that heterosexual unions are more "special" is purely a value judgement based on your preference for them. Fact is that a sizeable homosexual community find the homosexual union to be more "special". Is it fair that YOUR right to call it special should be codified by LAW whereas homosexuals aren't afforded that right.

The fact that there is a sizable homosexual community is a result of there being a certain percentage of people that are homosexual. When you have 300 million people, even a 1 percent population will be a sizable number. It's not a "value" judgement that I find the homosexual union abnormal. There is no scientific purpose, reason, or cause for homosexuality. If anything homosexual people are trying to force an unfounded and unjustified human abnormality on the rest of society.

It is every man and woman's choice what they consider to be "special". No legislation should infringe uponthat right. It would essentially be like having your constitution say that Islam is OK but Christianity is BETTER.