 Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun  I disagree, all any politician will have to do is bring up the case in New Jersey or Vermont where they have civil unions and the "homosexual activists"(the ones from the other thread no doubt) are pushing for full marriage. It's stuff like that that makes me proud that my state passed an amendment banning anything, because if civil unions won't solve the issue, then I'll just as well grant nothing to save the aggravation. | In the case of the 2 states above as I see it the states will not or can not uphold the law. As I said in the other thread if the state will not up hold the law it will never work.Also as I read it the wording on the law is not the same as the U.K.It has to many loop holes in it.
I also said in the other thread that it will also never work if it is done state by state.The Gov has to step in and make a law that will give everyone the same rights. I know before you say it that that will not happen in the near future but with the right Gov. it could happen.
Yes you are right that there will be some that will not be happy until it is called marriage but there will also be others that will not be happy till all the gays are put on a island somewhere.(Corse the isle of Lesvos aka Lesbos in the Greek isles is rather nice in my book  )You can't make everyone happy but you can make most happy. |