View Single Post
Old 12-05-2007, 10:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
baloney_detector
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Country:
Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
baloney_detector is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
Surprise surprise. Wrong about WMD's again, who would'a thunk it?
Hmmm, now I'm confused.

In October 2002, a National Intelligence Estimate report stated that "Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in defiance of UN resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions; if left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade."

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/...%20release.pdf

So then, are we to trust the conclusions stated in this new report on Iran from this same government body?

And, if they were wrong about Iraq in 2002, then why couldn't they also be wrong about Iran in 2007?

Last edited by baloney_detector; 12-05-2007 at 10:16 PM.