Thread: Texan shoots burglars in cold blood - no charges pressed
View Single Post
Old 12-06-2007, 09:29 AM   #16 (permalink)
DanteBoston
Citizen
 
DanteBoston's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boston Area
Gender: Male
Posts: 112
Country:
Points: 790, Level: 14
Points: 790, Level: 14 Points: 790, Level: 14 Points: 790, Level: 14
Level up: 90%, 10 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
DanteBoston is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear View Post
Yes. One would think that captured on tape, there are the facts.

I agree.

Kind of like your take on how Mrs. Kravitz saw things differently in the home of Samantha and Darren Stevens, is there room for more details than what is on the tape?
For more than meets the eye? Or less as the case may be?

I am just gonna betcha that the court will take considerably longer to decide than what we all have. And that based on more than a tape of a crime-in-progress.

I am NOT siding with the criminals here. Just so ya know...

OhDear
nope.

Mrs. Kravitz was a busy body and we see her info through the filter of her perceptions. The tape speaks for itself. Of course there is more info, but the basic facts will always be the same.

The courts would not be asked to decide what we have. And in a court of law even a man caught red handed is presumed to be innocent...for the purposes of a fair hearing. People always misunderstand .

Justice is blind: is one reason a really good lawyer keeps their client as far away from the court as possible.

Innocent until proven guilty: In law only. Even the State, the Prosecutor presumes guilt as they bring the charges in the first place.

---

One issue: was a crime committed by the man with the weapon?

If not, case closed...in court.


-------

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic." - John F. Kennedy