Thread: Control Freaks and Gun-control
View Single Post
Old 12-12-2007, 11:43 PM   #59 (permalink)
nuttyjoe
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,356
Points: 6,944, Level: 54
Points: 6,944, Level: 54 Points: 6,944, Level: 54 Points: 6,944, Level: 54
Level up: 97%, 6 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
nuttyjoe is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
Nuttyjoe.

Just to clarify, when I said firing squad, I was referring to fleeing rapists and murders, ie, the homeowner can shoot at them.

I don’t think there’s a perfect solution to this problem, but one thing I’m certain of, is that I don’t like the idea of limiting the homeowners options for the sake of the criminal, IOW, if an imperfect law means that crime drops significantly, then I’m in favour of it, and various what if’s by and large must be ignored otherwise the scale tips towards the crims.

Under no circumstance should you break and enter into a property, if you chose to, then you’re at the mercy of the occupants, especially if you’re inside the physical structure.

I think most people would agree that there might be a few tragic cases initially, and perhaps now and then, but our goal should be the protection of life and property of law abiding citizens, not being concerned whether or not we’re being excessive towards those who’ve rejected basic moral laws….and remember, the occupants may decide not to shoot on some occasions, but it’s totally up to them.
My apologies, sir; on my misinterpretation on what you were implying about firing squads.
For the record; I agree that there is no perfect solution to this problem. I think we all have a differing opinion on what "imminent danger" (or jeopardy) to one's own life defines. Self-defense in such a situation is even harder for others to define and decide upon for a victim in such a situation. This, in itself, is why gun control laws really need to be clearly defined; as they work both ways- as you've pointed out. The worst possible scenario I can think of is a potential victim being too caught up with deciding if he (or she) would be legal in repelling an home invader; only to enhance the own danger to their life. This is why I suggest that those who choose to shoot; to shoot to wound or incapacitate. But I never think you do not have the right to protect yourself; Jen. I also apologize if you took my words to have suggested such.