Quote:
Originally Posted by Catus Felidae If you're going to spend the 'had abortion been legal, all these wonderful people might have been aborted' coin, then you have to allow for the opposite side to use the opposite side of that coin.
If abortion had been legal and Ted Bundy had been aborted, just think how many women, and the children they would have had, would be alive today. | It clearly would not have been 1.6 million per year. Just listen to the cognation to reason from the people that only support abortion on demand because they perceive it be a "core" issue of their political position. Does anyone really believe that an endangered animals life, no matter how close to extinction they my be, is worth comparing to a human life, simply because they have presented the absurd position that "humans" are not endangered or else they also might be protected? We are told everything that presents the unborn child as anything other than human. They have no cognation to reason, the cruel procedure does not hurt them because they are just a lump of cells with no feelings, they are legally defined as a non-living entity thus I feel no guilt, the womans body is her own body and thus the unborn is her property,.....the list goes on and on, women will still get the procedure even if it is illegal, we simply want to protect those women while killing over a million babies a year for social reasons.
DO ANY OF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THE ABSURD POSITIONS THAT MUST BE TAKEN TO PROTECT THE "LOUD MOUTHED" 5% OF OUR PARTY THAT THINKS THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE POLICY SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE POWER AND MONEY? Its time to stand up and have someone represent the middle class of our party that has roots there, that is not some "blue blood" limo-liberal who considers screwing with peoples lives as a "noble" cause, as the common "folk" are just to ignorant to decide for themselves. Slavery, clearly still exists in this nation, its masters simply wears another hat, or should I say "robe". The last "real" democrat that held the position of president, and asked the question "What can I do for my country, not what can my country do for me?", was in fact JFK. And apparently he was killed because he believed in a strong defense, lowering taxes when our nation was in the middle of a recession, family and God, and could not be led around by the nose. Where is the next democrat coming from that also believes in these things but also realizes that social issues must represented just not at the expense of our national security? JFK, no doubt in today's political atmosphere would be portrayed as an extreme conservative by the fringe powers that control the main stream media. There is still such as thing as a DEMOCRAT that believes in the constitution, family, God, the right of self protection and social programs that work for the people as something other than a "political" carrot. I KNOW, I AM ONE (R)
Last edited by Ralph; 01-04-2008 at 03:02 PM.
|