 Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun  If anything was "proven" then he would have said so. What if that "gay gene" is related to a defective gene? You have to wonder if irrefutable evidence of a "gay gene" is found why no one has announced it. But that's your spin. I'll leave it up to you to continue that line of discussion. The important part of what I made the thread up was the part that I C@P'd. Even IF the gay gene was detected, when a vast majority of the children are to heterosexual people, would a woman want to keep a baby she knows before birth is gay? Or would she try to "fix" it? |
well actually that isn't what the study said..both studies used gene therapy and hormone therapy to make less complicate species act in a certain way..Genes and Hormones are naturally occuring things ..thus the behavior they turned on and off was natural..in one study they turned off gay behavior and in the other they turned of hetereosexual behavior which would mean both are genetic predispositions
they haven't announced a gay gene you simple minded fool because humans are not fruit flys ..all we know is that turning on and off certain behavior is possible in mice and fruit flys soemthing that we already actually knew..perhaps you need to research more and stop trying to find every gay related article so as to post it here and perhaps then you'd not have to google Tristan for entertainment either
Last edited by Gadgetory; 01-08-2008 at 07:05 PM.
|