01-31-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
| Partisan
Country:  Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Gender: 
Posts: 8,279
Thanks: 92
Thanked 174 Times in 148 Posts
Points: 24,684, Level: 95 | Level up: 96%, 666 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski  The testimony was not material to the case???? Come now do you really believe I would buy that lie????? Lets see, Clinton was being deposed regarding his alleged sexual harassment of Paula Jones. Last time I checked, sexual harassment included a person in a position of power utilizing that position to gain sexual favors from a subordinate. | That presupposes that the subordinate doesn't stand to gain any benefit from the alleged harassment.
In Paula Jones case she alleged that her good reputation had been damaged by Clinton. Shortly after she received $500k in damages from the court she appeared nude in Playboy!
Apparently her Arkansas country-girl modesty and concerns over character had been overcome by then!
As for Monica she deliberately kept the infamous blue dress before subsequently spilling the beans (scuse the pun) to her equally stupid girlfriend and equally manipulative mother.
It's hard to believe Monica didn't believe she would benefit in some way from her consensual tryst with the President.
I'm not defending Clinton's sleaziness just pointing out that the case for harassment can be made in both directions.
__________________
|
|  |