| Block Captain Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Western New York Gender:  Posts: 208 Country:  Level up: 47%, 53 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady So, let me get this straight....
First you say there is no scientific consensus.
Then I prove you wrong, and show that there IS a scientific consensus.
Then you change your tune and say, wait, a consensus doesn't mean dick, and it's just politics.
Wow, you really are a Republican!!!! | Your proof is very weak. "Consensus" needs to be of qualified people. Fully 90% of the "scientists" who signed a letter that was frequently cited by the Clinton-Gore administration as evidence of scientific consensus on global warming are not qualified to be called experts on the issue. The letter circulated by the environmental group Ozone Action, ofers the names of some 2,600 alleged experts on climate change, only one of whom is, in fact, a climatologist. Among these so called experts on global warming are a plastic surgeon, two landscape architects, one hotel administrator, a gynecologist, seven linguists, and even one person whose academic background is in traditional Chinese medicine. So much for their consensus. "For my own part, I sincerely esteem it a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests". Alexander Hamilton, 1787 (After the Constitutional Convention)
"An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health". Planned Parenthood, 1963 |