Gary: I'm not "scared" to do that. It's just not relevant. I posted the relevant sections. You haven't said where I misquoted you or changed your post. Those are serious charges on my honour, gary, something I take seriously. I suggest you address them.

By the way, I *did* notice that you posted your revised message that you rewrote to justify your prejudice. Just so that everyone can clearly see your dishonesty.

http://www.defendingthetruth.com/abo...tml#post161791 (Women on waves...)
"Not sure where you've been but that is exactly the point I was making, which you are now partially agreeing with.

Animals have a sexual instinct which is enjoyable in order to ensure procreation, just as we have taste buds to make eating enjoyable so we won't starve. Ands we have a sense of pain to avoid injuring ourselves.

No it doesn't mean that we have to make a baby every time we have sex, but that's the purpose of the sexual function.

Hence any deviation from that purpose is............deviant

or dysfunctional.

Just like trying to eat with your ears.

Try mutating on that for a while"

That is the post I accurately quoted and that you accused me of editing.

The one you posted was the one you revised when you realized that the one I'm quoting doesn't segregate hetero and homosexual sex enough for you to maintain your prejudice.

By definition, no, I'm not a homosexual. I may engage what can be referred to as homosexual activities. Modern usage of the word, however, denotes an exclusivity of sexual activity with one gender.

No need to thank me for clearing up your confusion.