View Single Post
Old 02-21-2008, 07:52 PM   #89 (permalink)
baloney_detector
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,264
Country:
Points: 7,372, Level: 57
Points: 7,372, Level: 57 Points: 7,372, Level: 57 Points: 7,372, Level: 57
Level up: 11%, 178 Points needed
Level up: 11% Level up: 11% Level up: 11%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
baloney_detector is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
That's bullshit and you know it. There has been no confirmation of the number of homosexuals being controlled by population. The percentages would have to be variable with population for that to be the case. There are many other control factors available before that would be a factor. Additionally, males are effected by it more often than females. Just like all the other sexual dysfunction. If you are gonna control population, you would remove the actual breeders from the mix. Try again. You lose.
Perhaps reading comprehension isn't your forte. Nowhere in my post is it stated or even implied that the number of homosexuals within a population is somehow controlled by the size of a population.

You stated that "no species on the planet has a real use for homosexuality." Well, you are evidently wrong about this conclusion since homosexuality clearly plays a useful role in helping to limit the numbers within a population of some species, including the species, Homo Sapiens.

(Does your statement, "Try again. You lose," really seem to help boost your self-esteem...or something of that nature?)